The article doesn't actually say what the relevant "telecommunications laws which prohibit certain types of scanners and people interfering with telecommunication" are.. does it? I'm not really familiar with Australian sigint laws.
Also it's kind of funny that there is already the term "drone epidemic" being used by this professor. In the Gatwick drone incident, the police issued a statement about the possibility that, because they relied upon eyewitnesses, the drone might not have existed.
The article doesn't actually say what the relevant "telecommunications laws which prohibit certain types of scanners and people interfering with telecommunication" are.. does it? I'm not really familiar with Australian sigint laws.
Also it's kind of funny that there is already the term "drone epidemic" being used by this professor. In the Gatwick drone incident, the police issued a statement about the possibility that, because they relied upon eyewitnesses, the drone might not have existed.